In short, thanks to the regulation, a casino with an online gambling license from another country can also offer you a safe all-round package with all the benefits of a valid online casino license. This includes the all-important security, data and player protection, as well as state-regulated and certified fair play. You can get acquainted with the lineup of casinos at BestCasinosInCanada.net resource.

What are gambling commissions and how do they work?

Gambling commissions are public bodies that regulate gambling and monitor gambling laws. Their remit includes betting, bingo, casino, slot machines and lotteries, but not spread betting. On the one hand, the aim is to keep crime out of gambling such as money laundering. On the other hand, vulnerable individuals are to be protected by certain measures.

The commissions issue licenses to gambling providers who comply with the given regulations. However, they can also impose fines and revoke licenses in the event of non-compliance with the applicable laws.

Furthermore, they are charged with investigating and prosecuting illegal gambling and advising the government on gambling issues. They also cooperate with the police in cases of suspected illegal gambling.

1. Gambling Licenses in Malta

The island of Malta continues to experience an upswing in online gambling. The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) issues the most online gambling licenses in Europe. Malta joined the EU in 2004 and was the first country to introduce online gambling laws. Its first gambling licenses to relevant software publishers were issued the year the MGA was established.

The license has comprehensive player protection and enjoys a good reputation widely.

2. Gambling licenses in Curaçao

The island has been issuing online gambling licenses since 1996, making it one of the first in the world. For example, the license examination procedure is said to be much simpler compared to the British one. It is easier to obtain, which comes with a reputation of lack of validation of the provider’s technical systems.

The Curaçao Licensing Authority does not usually intervene in disputes between players and operators. So, the Curacao license from the player’s point of view is more risky.

How to get a gambling license?

In order to obtain a license, there are certain requirements that must be met. Those who wish to acquire an online casino license first submit an application to the relevant gambling commission. If all the requirements are met and the examination is successfully passed, then nothing stands in the way of the license.

What are the criteria for casino licensing?

There are some industry-specific licensing requirements and compliance rules that must be met before gambling licenses are issued.

1. Compliance with the law

These regulations vary depending on the licensor. These include general requirements, costs, tax policies, and processing time for applications.

2. No criminality

A background check of the operator is conducted. Individuals suspected of being involved in illegal activities will be turned away, even without an application review.

3. Liquidity

Obtaining the license as well as operating the online casino cost. It must be proven that the necessary funds are available.

4. Software

The casino software must meet the legal requirements. A detailed description of the software functions and games, agreements with software providers and a certificate of the RNG (Random Number Generator) must be available.

Can a casino be operated without a license?

In principle, every legally operating gambling operator needs a corresponding license. However, the reality often looks different. There are some casinos which offer their services without a license. Caution is advised here, because in case of fraud it is almost impossible to take legal action. If in doubt, it is worth taking a closer look at the license and reading testimonials.

What are blacklisted casinos?

As already described, not all online casinos adhere to the applicable regulations. There are some that have a bad reputation due to lack of licensing, lack of payouts and unfair play. Because of this misconduct, they are listed on the so-called “blacklist” so that no more players fall victim to them. These casinos do not have valid gambling licenses.

Conclusion

Gambling licenses are essential for player safety. That is why it is best to play only on websites that have a reputable EU license. Because such an online casino license is also valid for Austria. This way, you can avoid nasty surprises and enjoy the gaming experience worry-free.

The post Why are gambling licenses so important? appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Freedom House supports frontline activists in their efforts to defend fundamental rights, including to document abuses, advocate for justice, end impunity, and fortify the self-protection of human rights defenders. We also provide emergency assistance to human rights defenders who come under threat and work with activists to broaden public support for upholding human rights and the fight for equality. 

The general principle of equality and non-discrimination is a fundamental element of international human rights law.

A useful definition of non-discrimination is contained in Article 1(1) ILO 111, which provides that discrimination includes: ‘Any distinction, exclusion or preference made on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in the employment or occupation [?].’ Thus, the right to equal treatment requires that all persons be treated equally before the law, without discrimination. The principle of equality and non-discrimination guarantees that those in equal circumstances are dealt with equally in law and practice. However, it is important to stress that not every distinction or difference in treatment will amount to discrimination. In general international law, a violation of the principle of non-discrimination arises if: a) equal cases are treated in a different manner; b) a difference in treatment does not have an objective and reasonable justification; or c) if there is no proportionality between the aim sought and the means employed. These requirements have been expressly set out by international human rights supervisory bodies, including the European Court (see, e.g.,Marckx v. Belgium), the Inter-American Court (see, e.g,. Advisory Opinion No. 4, para. 57) and the Human Rights Committee (see, e.g., General Comment 18, para. 13 andJacobs v. Belgium).

The principle of equality can in certain circumstances require a state to take affirmative action in order to diminish or eliminate conditions that cause or help to perpetuate discrimination. The Human Rights Committee has clearly stated this obligation in General Comment 18, and the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights frequently refers to the duty to take affirmative action in its Concluding Observations. For further analysis of this principle, see I§3.B.

The post Equality & Human Rights appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Free and independent media are a cornerstone of democratic societies. The OSCE monitors media developments in its participating States for violations of free expression. This includes monitoring and demanding accountability for murders, attacks and harassment of journalists and prosecution of journalists and members of the media for their professional activities; reviewing legislation that can affect free expression and legislation regulating the media. The OSCE also engages in media development through training and support for editors and journalists.

The Representative on Freedom of the Media, an independent OSCE Institution, has a unique mandate to protect and promote media freedom in all 57 OSCE participating States. The Representative’s activities include observing media developments as part of an early warning function and helping participating States abide by their commitments to freedom of expression and free media.

Many of the OSCE’s field operations also pursue activities dedicated to media freedom and development, which include:

• Monitoring the work of media regulators;
• Monitoring and reviewing the improvement and implementation of media legislation;
• Supporting national reforms in broadcasting;
• Providing technical expertise to national authorities, for example on transitioning from analogue to digital broadcasting;
• Fostering transparency, credibility and independence of media;
• Advising media outlets;
• Organizing training for journalists, law enforcement, lawyers, judges, civil servants, students;
• Monitoring freedom of the media;
• Documenting cases of media rights violations;
• Holding public discussions; and
• Supporting independent media outlets.

The OSCE also focuses on topics such as safety of journalists, media self-regulation, access to information, professional reporting on the internet, freedom of expression and new media technologies. The Organization promotes sharing of best practices across the OSCE region to strengthen freedom of the media in line with international standards and OSCE principles and commitments.

The post Media Freedom appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Government accountability and transparency ensure that malfeasance is exposed—and that failed or harmful policies are swiftly corrected.

Freedom House research, including Freedom in the World, has documented the global decline in government accountability, transparency, and rule of law, as authoritarian leaders ignore the most basic elements of due process, misuse the justice system to persecute their critics, and perpetuate impunity for corruption and abuses of power. Freedom House supports local efforts to strengthen the rule of law, including to end torture, hold human rights abusers to account, and promote judicial reforms.

“Transparency” is government’s obligation to share information with citizens that is needed to make informed decisions and hold officials accountable for the conduct of the people’s business. Transparency exists on government websites largely at the munificence of officials.  The burden of negotiating complex and costly Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) petitions rests squarely on the shoulders of citizens and journalists.  Despite “sunshine” laws and much pro-transparency rhetoric, information requests by journalists and citizens are routinely ignored, given the bureaucratic “slow roll” and discouraged by inflated price tags for staff time and copying. FOIAs and official goodwill are insufficient in securing citizens and journalists information they need and have a right to review. Therefore, this act affirms that the government of the state of {insert state} has a duty to affirmatively disclose certain information, in a timely manner, and to shift the burden from citizens and journalists to the state, to share all information necessary, so that citizens may hold their elected officials accountable.

The post Government Accountability & Transparency appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Freedom of worship—of belief and nonbelief—is an important element of democracy, contributing to social peace, encouraging full political participation, and strengthening pluralism more broadly. Free religious communities can make important contributions to society, and individual conscience can serve as a last bastion of liberty and a source of great resolve in highly repressive settings.

Freedom House provides emergency assistance to religious freedom defenders, civil society organizations, and survivors of religious persecution in dozens of countries. This assistance has benefitted individuals from more than a dozen different faiths. It covers medical treatment, legal representation, prison visits, trial monitoring, dependent support, and temporary relocation. We also support local initiatives to promote tolerance and proactively address hostility toward religious minority groups and ongoing tensions between different faith communities. 

The post Religious Freedom appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Your voice matters. You have the right to say what you think, share information and demand a better world. You also have the right to agree or disagree with those in power, and to express these opinions in peaceful protests.

Exercising these rights – without fear or unlawful interference – is central to living in an open and fair society; one in which people can access justice and enjoy their human rights.

Yet governments around the world routinely imprison people – or worse – for speaking out, even though almost every country’s constitution refers to the value of ‘free speech’.

Governments have a duty to prohibit hateful, inciteful speech but many abuse their authority to silence peaceful dissent by passing laws criminalising freedom of expression. This is often done in the name of counter-terrorism, national security or religion. More recently, freedom of expression has come under threat by authorities clamping down on activists, NGOs and individuals helping refugees and migrants.

How governments tolerate unfavourable views or critical voices is often a good indication of how they treat human rights generally.

Amnesty International supports people who speak out peacefully for themselves and for others – whether a journalist reporting on violence by security forces, a trade unionist exposing poor working conditions or an indigenous leader defending their land rights against big business. We would similarly defend the right of those who support the positions of big business, the security forces and employers to express their views peacefully.

We consider anyone put in prison solely for exercising their right to free speech peacefully to be a prisoner of conscience and call for their immediate and unconditional release.

The post Freedom of Expression appeared first on Alert-Rights.

Governments often violate the right to freedom of assembly as a method of suppressing dissent and critical voices. The right to peaceful protest is indeed a core component to the right to assemble peacefully. However, in many circumstances, peaceful protestors are subject to arrest, violence, threats or intimidation.

In some cases, legal provisions criminalise organisers and those participating in peaceful assemblies, and in other cases, interpretations of the law may be manipulated to legitimise the arrest of peaceful protestors. Intimidation techniques such as these often engender a culture of self-censorship.

Violations of the right to freedom of assembly therefore have serious implications for society, as they deny an open and pluralistic dialogue and repress one of civil society’s core measures for challenging authorities.

Also, more and more States are trying to block social media and communication tools, to hinder the  organisation of protests. No such restrictions should be permitted.

States must refrain from using pretences to abusively restrict the right to protest, such as through misusing anti-terrorism or national security measures. Rather, they should facilitate access to the public space and ensure the smooth holding of protests, without undue use of violence by law enforcement officials.

Countries’ legal frameworks must contain effective, clear, and reasonable provisions on the right to protest; limitations should be a last resort. The right to protest lies in the recognition and protection of rights that include freedoms of expression and opinion, association, and peaceful assembly.

The post Freedom of Assembly appeared first on Alert-Rights.